|
The
pace of cancer research is so great, the press tells us, that cancer
will be vanished very soon. There is no dearth of responsible publications
curing cancer almost every week.
|
Here
we reproduce / narrate some reports which appeared in various Indian daily and
other international dailies
Cancer Vaccine May End Chemotherapy
A new era in cancer therapy
could be opened later this year with the launch of a vaccine which tackles
the disease in a new way and could spell the end of chemotherapy.
Melacine is the first
cancer vaccine which has been developed as a treatment for advanced
melanoma, the most aggressive form of skin cancer which claims 2,000 lives a
year in the UK. The drug is expected to win approval from the US Food and
Drugs Administration within the next six months after trials in patients
showed ‘promising’ results. more......
War on cancer proving to be long slog
-Hindustan Times July 31st 2003
Not long ago, the defeat of
cancer seemed inevitable. No more chemotherapy, the thinking went. No more
horrid side effects. Just brilliantly designed drugs that stop cancer while
leaving everything else untouched.
Those elegant drugs are now here. But so is cancer.
The dearth of substantial impact so far suggests the fight against cancer
will continue to be a tedious slog, and victories will not be scored in weeks or
months of extra life. The potential of the new approach may take decades to
be realized.
The drugs, called targeted therapies, are intended to arrest cancer by
disrupting the internal signals that fuel its growth. Unlike chemo, which
attacks all dividing cells, these medicines are crafted to go after the
genetically controlled irregularities that make cancer unique.
Several agents have made it through testing, but despite their apparent bull's-eye
hits, lasting results are rare. Instead, these new drugs turn out to be
about as effective — or as powerless — as chemotherapy. Aimed at the major
forms of cancer, they work spectacularly for a lucky few and modestly for
some.
But for most? Not at all.
At best, experts now expect knocking down cancer will require an elaborate
mixture of targeted drugs, assembled to match the distinct biology of each
person's cancer.
"It's a much more complicated problem than anyone ever appreciated," says Dr
Leonard Saltz, a colon cancer expert at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center. "It will, unfortunately, be with us for a long time."
The job is so daunting, especially for advanced cancers propelled by
potentially dozens of nefarious genetic mutations, that scientists are even
rethinking the goal of cancer research.
"Society as a whole, and most of the medical profession, have a wrong
understanding that we'll wake up one morning and find out cancer is cured. It
won't happen. The public should give it up," says Dr Craig Henderson of the
University of California, San Francisco.
Henderson and others have shifted their sights to something less —
converting cancer into a chronic disease, like diabetes. Treatments might
slow or even stop its worst effects so people survive for years reasonably
free of symptoms.
Dr Andrew von Eschenbach of the National Cancer Institute, argues that a
cure is not even necessary if this can be done, something he optimistically
hopes to see by 2015. But eliminate cancer? "Not in the foreseeable future,"
he says.
Controversial Cancer treatment
set for Trials
[London] The Italian government has set up
a commission to oversee clinical trial of a controversial, non-toxic cancer
treatment following intense public demand for the drug (see Nature 391,217;1998).
Last week 20,000 people took to the streets of Rome demanding access to the
treatment, devised by Luig di Bella, a doctor from Modena northern Italy.
Three experts, chaired by Gotdon Mc Vie,
director-general of the UK Cancer Research Campaign, will evaluate trials of
the therapy known as MDB. Di Bella says treatments should concentrate on
encouraging healthy cells to multiply rather than on destroying infected
cells. ---
Nature March 19th 1998
Cancer Sahyog
Sir, - We are a voluntary emotional
support group called 'Cancer Sahyog' working under the aegis of
Delhi Branch of the Indian Cancer Society. We have at present a limited pool
of volunteer cancer survivors associated with us. We would therefore, appeal
to survivors to join our effort to provide emotional support to those living
with cancer and to their families. Cancer survivors who wish to assist
should be free of their disease for at least a year and should have positive
attitude towards their cancer experience.
--Hindustan Times June 8, 1998
[We came to know that
Sahyog was unable to mobilize even 100 such volunteers who are "free of
their disease for at least a year"]
The Story of "Twin Magic Breast
Cancer" Drugs Of Folkman
In the month of May 1998 New York Times
(NYT)
carried out a story that a researcher by name of Folkman has
discovered a drug that will not only cure breast cancer but will also act as
"benign and effective therapy" instead of "toxic chemotherapy". NYT further
reported that Nobel Laureate James Watson had endorsed that "Folkman's twin
drugs will cure breast cancer in two years!!!". The Newsweek (18th May 1998)
wrote on the impact of the New York Times article on the American
masses - "The NYT article became the media equivalent of virulent flu. It
infected television broadcasts, newspapers, magazines and radio with
the idea that the researchers could actually cure the disease that Americans
fear more than any other". The Folkaman fever continued for 10 days and then
came the bombshell from Watson, who said 'Who is this Folkman? I do not know
him and I have been quoted falsely'. After this incident some reputed
American Oncologists came forward and said "Folkman's drugs can cure at best
lab-grown cancer on mice". The days of Folkman-Flu which had gripped
America, was of no purpose? Yes it indeed did wonders for the
Multi-national who had funded the Folkman research. "Their stock price
roller-coastarred from $12 to $85 and back down to $52. For a few days, the
word angiogenesis was more ubiquitous than the name Lewinsky (President
Clinton's White House friend)".
Summing up the entire episode an American
journalist wrote "Where patients saw hope, investors saw gold".